nd
Private
Content
1 line{delete}{if({in(817067463573110817):{channel(id)}}==true):**{user(mention)}**:|}Embed
1 line{"color": 6603741, "title": "Why the 'neurodiversity' movement is harmful", "fields": [{"name": "For more reading:", "value": "• [Let’s talk about the neurodiversity movement for a bit.](https://www.reddit.com/r/ADHD/comments/md5cfr/lets_talk_about_the_neurodiversity_movement_a_bit/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3)\n• [r/ADHD’s position on neurodiversity](https://www.reddit.com/r/adhd/wiki/resources/neurodiversity) ([reddit thread](https://www.reddit.com/r/ADHD/comments/ms95dl/radhds_position_on_neurodiversity/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3))\n", "inline": false}], "description": "We consider the neurodiversity movement and paradigm harmful. They try to reframe mental illnesses and/or disorders as mere \"neurological variations\" instead of the harmful conditions they really are. A large part of the movement is anti-psychiatry and anti-treatment. We don't support this demedicalisation of mental illnesses and/or disorders. That is antithetical to {server}'s pro-science and pro-treatment values, and while there may be space to debate this - that place isn't here.\n\nPer [Dr. Barkley](https://www.reddit.com/r/ADHD/comments/l9lr9f/radhd_iama_with_dr_russell_barkley/glr04e7/?context=3), this claim of \"mere neurological variations\" is partly true. However, when said \"variation\" reaches a point that it significantly impairs functioning, then it's not just a \"variation\", but a harmful dysfunction, a disorder. If we accept the neurodiversity argument, then no treatment would be provided to those in need of it. We can't dance around the word disorder or disability on one hand and then seek understanding or accommodations from society on the other. \n\n*\"Neurotypical\" and \"neurodiverse\" are terms coined by the 'neurodiversity' movement and we do not condone them. Instead, think about using \"people with(out) ADHD\".*\n\n**TL;DR**: framing ADHD as a mere neurological variation is unhelpful; a refusal to acknowledge the harm it has done to our lives and the struggles we face daily. We want ADHD to be recognised for what it *really* is - a disorder that can greatly impair one's functioning - so our suffering can be acknowledged, treated and accommodated for."}Raw JSON
{
"id": 167705,
"created_at": "2020-05-01T20:17:07.000Z",
"tag_name": "nd",
"nsfw": false,
"owner_id": "261234886394773505",
"uses": 325,
"description": null,
"restricted": false,
"shared": false,
"deleted": false,
"safe": "",
"hidden": false,
"guild_id": "312253975036559362",
"sharer": "465970731612635136",
"content": "{delete}{if({in(817067463573110817):{channel(id)}}==true):**{user(mention)}**:|}",
"embed": "{\"color\": 6603741, \"title\": \"Why the 'neurodiversity' movement is harmful\", \"fields\": [{\"name\": \"For more reading:\", \"value\": \"• [Let’s talk about the neurodiversity movement for a bit.](https://www.reddit.com/r/ADHD/comments/md5cfr/lets_talk_about_the_neurodiversity_movement_a_bit/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3)\\n• [r/ADHD’s position on neurodiversity](https://www.reddit.com/r/adhd/wiki/resources/neurodiversity) ([reddit thread](https://www.reddit.com/r/ADHD/comments/ms95dl/radhds_position_on_neurodiversity/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3))\\n\", \"inline\": false}], \"description\": \"We consider the neurodiversity movement and paradigm harmful. They try to reframe mental illnesses and/or disorders as mere \\\"neurological variations\\\" instead of the harmful conditions they really are. A large part of the movement is anti-psychiatry and anti-treatment. We don't support this demedicalisation of mental illnesses and/or disorders. That is antithetical to {server}'s pro-science and pro-treatment values, and while there may be space to debate this - that place isn't here.\\n\\nPer [Dr. Barkley](https://www.reddit.com/r/ADHD/comments/l9lr9f/radhd_iama_with_dr_russell_barkley/glr04e7/?context=3), this claim of \\\"mere neurological variations\\\" is partly true. However, when said \\\"variation\\\" reaches a point that it significantly impairs functioning, then it's not just a \\\"variation\\\", but a harmful dysfunction, a disorder. If we accept the neurodiversity argument, then no treatment would be provided to those in need of it. We can't dance around the word disorder or disability on one hand and then seek understanding or accommodations from society on the other. \\n\\n*\\\"Neurotypical\\\" and \\\"neurodiverse\\\" are terms coined by the 'neurodiversity' movement and we do not condone them. Instead, think about using \\\"people with(out) ADHD\\\".*\\n\\n**TL;DR**: framing ADHD as a mere neurological variation is unhelpful; a refusal to acknowledge the harm it has done to our lives and the struggles we face daily. We want ADHD to be recognised for what it *really* is - a disorder that can greatly impair one's functioning - so our suffering can be acknowledged, treated and accommodated for.\"}",
"last_fetched": "2026-10-20T21:21:41.507Z"
}